The idea of winning people over to a decision you yourself don't even know for sure is the correct one is such a cool idea that I feel is a huge missed opportunity. It's so much less interesting coming to a conclusion the moment the question is asked since you already know the big picture, and thus the only reason you need to gather information is so you can force that decision on others.
For instance, the scales thingy would be a lot more interesting if prior to gathering information, you didn't already know much about the circumstances yourself from the multiple perspective storytelling. For the fourth question, they also told me the vanishing vessel wasn't sufficient evidence, but when I reloaded and picked the option about people sighted going to the source, they seem to take that as a logical answer (and it makes Sorsely sweat).I feel like I would've enjoyed the game and the story more if I had less of an idea of what's going on in the story. If you mention you got the information from Lyla's Aide, they seem to give a much more positive reaction (and Sorsely starts sweating which seems to be the indicator you got a question right). For the third question if you answer that Clarus gave you the information, they indicate that doesn't matter because he's just a merchant and not a believer of the goddess. I think you also have the wrong answer listed for the third and fourth question. You may even be able to get 2 out of 5 wrong. First, you don't need to get every single question right - you can get the grounding amulet even if you answer one of them wrong (I said I have no evidence for the second question and still managed to win). I think you have 2 things wrong regarding the trial, however.
0 kommentar(er)
